(2013) pointed out how Mode A weights (i.e., correlation weights) are slightly different from the Mode A loadings, and that Mode A weights (i.e., correlation weights) should be interpreted in a similar way to Mode B weights (i.e., regression weights).ġ.I did not understand the exact difference between Mode A weights and loadings. (2013) proposed a rule regarding the preferable usage of Mode A instead of Mode B for formative constructs (under some conditions). I decided to keep this formative indicator (i.e., PC1) based on the rule mentioned above (i.e., based on the loading not the weight), how should I interpret the influence of PC1 on the final endogenous construct CSC?Ģ. If one of the formative indicators of PC (let us say PC1) has insignificant weight, but has a high and/or significant loading on the construct PC. Assume that a formative construct (PC) is influencing an endogenous construct (CSC). In relation to this rule, I have one question, which I present after an example of a situation. (2013) and Cenfetelli and Bassellier (2009) proposed a rule regarding keeping formative indicators, which states that formative indicators with insignificant weights can be kept if their loadings are high (i.e., above. Can you comment and give answers to the points below.ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |